BLOGS   WRITE NEW BLOG   EDIT BLOGS  
RSS
What does the FDA do ?
OFFLINE

Posted On 12/23/2009 06:51:46 by An-American-Taxpayer
What does the FDA do?

I ask this question because in looking over there website I see that Nestle was sent 2 warning letters in 2 days.

I am not singling out Nestle,  there are many warning letters on the FDA website, some a minor offenses others are much more serious.   

I do not understand why the FDA,  can not order the websites to be shut down via the domain register and host and the offending products to be confiscated.  Is not the FDA tasked with making sure food and medications are safe and do what they say they will do ?

Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, 12/3/09

   

Department of Health and Human Services' logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
  College Park. MD 20740

DEC 03 2009


David Yates
President
Nestle HealthCare Nutrition
10801 Red Circle Drive
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343

WARNING LETTER

Re: CFSAN-OC-10-04

Dear Mr. Yates:

This is to advise you that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your websites at the Internet addresses http://www.Nestle-Nutrition.com, www.NestleNutritionStore.com, and http://www.kidessentials.com in November 2009. Your BOOST Kid Essentials Nutritionally Complete Drink (Vanilla, Chocolate, and Strawberry flavors) is promoted on your websites as a "medical food," and the labeling claims on your websites represent the product as a medical food for the medical condition of "failure to thrive" and also for "pre/post surgery, injury or trauma, chronic illnesses." As discussed further below, this product is misbranded under Section 403(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 343(a)(1)], because the label is false or misleading in that the product is labeled and marketed as a medical food but does not meet the statutory definition of a medical food in the Orphan Drug Act [21 U.S.C. § 360ee(b)(3)] or the criteria set forth in 21 C.F.R. 101.9(j)(8). Furthermore, this product is promoted for conditions that cause it to be a drug under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)]. The therapeutic claims on your website establish that this product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. The marketing of this product with these claims violates the Act.

Misbranded Food

The Orphan Drug Act defines "medical food" as "a food which is formulated to be consumed or administered enterally under the supervision of a physician and which is intended for the specific dietary management of a disease or condition for which distinctive nutritional requirements, based on recognized scientific principles, are established by medical evaluation." The regulation in 21 C.F.R. 101.9(j)(8) sets forth criteria to clarify the statutory definition of a medical food. Specifically, this regulation provides that a food is a medical food only if:

i. It is a specially formulated and processed product (as opposed to a naturally occurring foodstuff used in its natural state) for the partial or exclusive feeding of a patient by means of oral intake or enteral feeding tube;
ii. It is intended for the dietary management of a patient who, because of therapeutic or chronic medical needs, has limited or impaired capacity to ingest, digest, absorb, or metabolize ordinary foodstuffs or certain nutrients, or who has other special medically determined nutrient requirements, the dietary management of which cannot be achieved by the modification of the normal diet alone;
iii. It provides nutritional support specifically modified for the management of the unique nutrient needs that result from the specific disease or condition, as determined by medical evaluation;
iv. It is intended to be used under medical supervision; and
v. It is intended only for a patient receiving active and ongoing medical supervision wherein the patient requires medical care on a recurring basis for, among other things, instructions on the use of the medical food.

FDA considers the statutory definition of "medical food" to narrowly constrain the types of products that fit within this category.1 In addition to other criteria, medical foods must be for the dietary management of a specific disorder, disease, or condition for which there are distinctive nutritional requirements and must be intended to be used under medical supervision.2 Patients with such a disorder, disease, or condition must have a limited capacity to ingest, digest, absorb, or metabolize ordinary foodstuffs or certain nutrients, or have other special medically determined nutrient requirements, which cannot be managed by the modification of the normal diet alone.3 Medical foods are not those simply recommended by a physician as part of an overall diet to reduce the risk of a disease or condition.4 As discussed further below, your BOOST Kid Essentials Nutritionally Complete Drink product as reviewed on the aforementioned websites does not meet the regulatory criteria for a medical food.

There is no evidence that patients with the medical condition of "failure to thrive" have distinctive nutritional requirements or unique nutrient needs, as required by the statute and by 21 C.F.R. 101.9(j)(8). This condition could arise due to a number of reasons, including inappropriate dietary intake or defective utilization by the body. Because of this, the nutritional requirements and nutrient needs of individuals with this condition vary widely among patients. In addition, there is no distinctive nutritional requirement for "pre/post surgery, injury or trauma, chronic illnesses," as the nutritional requirements of individuals with these conditions vary greatly based on the specific circumstances of each individual.

No established distinctive nutritional requirement exists for the conditions for which your product is promoted as a medical food, and your BOOST Kid Essentials Nutritionally Complete Drink product therefore does not meet the statutory or regulatory definition of a medical food. Accordingly, your product is misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(a)(1)] because the label is false or misleading in that the product is labeled as a medical food but does not meet the definition of a medical food.

New Drug

Under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)], articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease are drugs. The therapeutic claims on your websites establish that your BOOST Kid Essentials Nutritionally Complete
Drink product is intended to be used as a drug. The marketing of this product with these claims violates the Act.

Specific examples of claims in your product labeling that promote your product as a drug are as follows:

• "[F]or pre/post surgery, injury or trauma, chronic illnesses ...."
• "Lactobacillus [an ingredient in your product] is one of the most widely studied genera
of probiotics, proving numerous health benefits across many illnesses."
• "If your child has stomach problems, such as diarrhea caused by antibiotics, probiotics [an ingredient in your product] may help rebuild a healthy colony of good bacteria ..."
• "Antioxidants [found in your product] ... can help kids fight off sickness at school, the playground, at home, or anywhere on-the-go."
• "Clinical benefits include ... reducing number of days with viral diarrhea, reducing the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ...."

In addition, when scientific publications are used commercially by the seller of a product to promote the product to consumers, such publications may become evidence of the product's intended use. For example, under 21 CFR 101.93(g)(2)(iv)(C), a citation of a publication or reference in the labeling of a product is considered to be a claim about disease treatment or prevention if the citation refers to a disease use and if, in the context of the labeling as a whole, the citation implies treatment or prevention of a disease. The following are examples of
reference citations used to market your product for disease treatment and prevention on your website:

• "Ivan A et al. Validation of the probiotic concept: Lactobacillus reuteri confers broad-spectrum protection against disease in humans and animals. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 2000;12(4)."

• "Johnston BC et al. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2: 1-34."
• "Szajewska H et al. Probiotics in gastrointestinal diseases in children: hard and no-so-hard evidence of efficacy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;42(5):454-75."

• "Weizman Z et al. Effect of a probiotic infant formula on infections in child care centers: comparison of two probiotic agents. Pediatrics 2005;115:5-9."

Your product is not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and, therefore, it is also a new drug under section 201(P) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally marketed in the United States without prior approval from FDA as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)]. FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective.

The above violations are not meant to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies in your products or their labeling. It is your responsibility to ensure that all of your products are in compliance with the laws and regulations enforced by FDA. You should take prompt action to correct
these violations. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in regulatory actions without further notice, such as seizure and/or injunction.

Please respond, in writing, within 15 working days from receipt of this letter. Your response should include the actions you plan to take in response to this letter, including an explanation of each step being taken to correct the current violations and prevent similar violations. Include any documentation necessary to show that correction has been achieved. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction.

Your response should be directed to Quyen Tien, Compliance Officer, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Compliance, Division of Enforcement, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway (HFS-608), College Park, Maryland 20740. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Tien at the above address or by phone at 215-717-3705.

Sincerely,

/s/

Roberta F. Wagner
Director
Office of Compliance
Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition
cc: FDA Minneapolis District Office

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Nestle USA, 12/4/09

   

Department of Health and Human Services' logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
  College Park, MD 20740

DEC 04 2009

 

 

Brad Alford, Chairman and CEO
Nestle U.S.A.
800 North Brand Boulevard
Glendale, CA 91203

WARNING LETTER

 

Re: CFSAN-OC-10-05

Dear Mr. Alford:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed the labeling for several Nestle Juicy Juice products: Juicy Juice Brain Development Fruit Juice Beverage (Apple), Juicy Juice All-Natural 100% Juice Orange Tangerine, and Juicy Juice All-Natural 100% Juice Grape. Based on our review, we have concluded that these products are misbranded within the meaning of section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 USC 343] because their labeling deviates from the requirements of the Act and FDA regulations at Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Your Juicy Juice Brain Development Fruit Juice Beverage product is misbranded within the meaning of section 403(r) of the Act [21 USC 343(r)] because its labeling includes unauthorized nutrient content claims. Except for statements that describe the percentage of a vitamin or mineral in relation to a Reference Daily Intake (RDI), a nutrient content claim cannot be made for a food intended for use by infants and children less than 2 years of age unless the claim is specifically provided for in parts 101, 105, or 107 of FDA regulations. 21 CFR 101.13(b)(3). This product is marketed specifically for children under two years of age, as indicated by the claim "Helps support brain development***In children under two years old," which appears on the product label. The label also bears the nutrient content claim "no sugar added." The circumstances under which a "no sugar added" claim is permitted are defined in 21 CFR 101.60(c). That regulation does not allow the claim for conventional food products intended for use in children under age 2. 21 CFR 101.60(c)(4). Therefore, the claim "no sugar added" misbrands your product.

On October 30, 2009. we also reviewed your website, http://www.juicyjuice.com. the address of which is listed on the Juicy Juice Brain Development Fruit Juice Beverage label. The labeling found on your website makes an additional unauthorized nutrient content claim, which
further misbrands the product. The website claims that Juicy Juice Brain Development Fruit Juice Beverage is "naturally lower in sugar." As noted above, except for statements that describe the percentage of a vitamin or mineral in relation to an RDI, no nutrient content claims can be made for a food intended specifically for use by infants and children less than 2 years of age unless specifically permitted by FDA regulations. 21 CFR 101.13(b)(3). The circumstances under which a "lower in sugar" claim is permitted are defined in 21 CFR 101.60(c)(5). That regulation does not allow the use of the claim for food products intended for use in children under age 2.

Additionally, we have reviewed the labeling of your Nestle Juicy Juice All Natural 100% Juice Orange Tangerine and Nestle Juicy Juice All Natural 100% Juice Grape products. These products are misbranded under section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 USC 343(a)(1)] because their labels are misleading. The label of the Orange Tangerine product is designed to imply that the product is 100% orange/tangerine juice, and the label of the Grape product is designed to imply that product is 100% grape juice. The principal display panels identify the products as "Orange Tangerine" and "Grape," respectively, in large, bold lettering outlined in black; however, neither orange/tangerine juice nor grape juice is the predominant juice in the products.The statements "All Natural-100% Juice" in close proximity to the words "Orange Tangerine"or "Grape" and vignettes of oranges or grapes also may lead consumers to believe that the products are 100% orange/tangerine juice or 100% grape juice when, in fact, they are not. The separate statement at the base of the respective principal display panels, "Flavored juice blend from concentrate with other natural flavors & added ingredients," appears in a smaller font and white print on a colored background. The manner in which the latter statement is presented makes it less conspicuous and prominent than the other label statements and vignettes and therefore less likely to be read or understood by consumers at the time of purchase.

The above violations are not meant to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies in your products or their labeling. It is your responsibility to ensure that all of your products are in compliance with the laws and regulations enforced by FDA. You should take prompt action to correct the violations. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in regulatory actions without further notice, such as seizure and/or injunction.

You should take prompt action to correct these violations. Please respond to this letter within 15 days from receipt with the actions you plan to take in response to this letter, including an explanation of each step being taken to correct the current violations and prevent similar violations. Include any documentation necessary to show that correction has been achieved. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction.

You should direct your written reply to Quyen Tien, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5100 Paint Brooch Parkway, Office of Compliance (HFS608), Division of Enforcement, College Park, Maryland 20740-3835.

Sincerely,

/S/

 

Roberta F. Wagner
Director
Office of Compliance
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

 

cc: FDA Los Angeles District Office

Tags: FDA Nestle























*** Copyright 2007 to Present © San Francisco Grapevine - Interactive City Magazine ***